Indicators_08-09_Outcome_04

Key

Indicator

2006/7

2007/8

2008/9 Q1

2008/9 Q2

2008/9 Q3

2008/9 Q4

Status

Note

Traffic - % of schools actively engaged with the Travel Plan process

N/A

91%

68%

72%

85%

87%

47 out of 54 schools actively engaged with the Travel Plan process

The percentage of schools registered as Eco Schools

94%

98%

100%

All 54 schools registered (National Average - 91%). Annual Indicator.

The percentage of schools gaining an Eco Schools Bronze Award

67%

81%

87%

At the end of March 2009, 47 schools (87%) held a Bronze Eco Award. Nationally average = 51%

Number of schools with a completed Travel Plan

N/A

15%

26%

14 out of the 54 Moray schools have completed Travel Plans

The percentage of schools gaining an Eco Schools Silver Award

37%

46%

52%

At the end of March 2009 28 schools (52%) have achieved a Silver Eco Award. National average = 46%

Indicator

2006/7

2007/8

2008/9 Q1

2008/9 Q2

2008/9 Q3

2008/9 Q4

Status

Note

% of Primary pupils meeting or exceeding the appropriate 5-14 level in Reading

83%

84%

84%

% of Primary pupils meeting or exceeding the appropriate 5-14 level in Writing

77%

78%

78%

% of Primary pupils meeting or exceeding the appropriate 5-14 level in Maths

83%

85%

85%

% of Secondary pupils meeting or exceeding the appropriate 5-14 level in Reading

68%

70%

73%

% of Secondary pupils meeting or exceeding the appropriate 5-14 level in Writing

61%

63%

61%

% of Secondary pupils meeting or exceeding the appropriate 5-14 level in Maths

64%

61%

63%

Percentage of S5 pupils with tariff score in quintile 1

19%

19%

N/A

Annual indicator. 2008/09 figures due out October 2009

Percentage of S5 pupils with tariff score in quintile 2

18%

22%

N/A

As above

Percentage of S5 pupils with tariff score in quintile 3

21%

21%

N/A

As above

Percentage of S5 pupils with tariff score in quintile 4

21%

16%

N/A

As above

Percentage of S5 pupils with tariff score in quintile 5

21%

22%

N/A

As above

Percentage of S6 pupils with tariff score in quintile 1

19%

21%

N/A

As above

Percentage of S6 pupils with tariff score in quintile 2

23%

18%

N/A

As above

Percentage of S6 pupils with tariff score in quintile 3

21%

24%

N/A

As above

Percentage of S6 pupils with tariff score in quintile 4

18%

17%

N/A

As above

Percentage of S6 pupils with tariff score in quintile 5

20%

19%

N/A

As above

Percentage of primary schools receiving an evaluation of 'Satisfactory or better' - Improvements in Performance

N/A

N/A

100%

100%

100%

75%

HMIe reports for Rothes, Bishopmill, Lhanbryde and Hopeman Primary Schools were carried out in Quarter 4. Lhanbryde was rated as Weak for Improvements in Performance with the other 3 schools being rated as Satisfactory or above.

Percentage of primary schools receiving an evaluation of 'Good or better' - Improvements in Performance

N/A

N/A

100%

0%

67%

50%

HMIe reports for Rothes, Bishopmill, Lhanbryde and Hopeman Primary Schools were published in Quarter 4. Two were evaluated as Good or better for Improvements in Performance.

Percentage of primary schools receiving an evaluation of 'Very Good or better' - Improvements in Performance

N/A

N/A

0%

0%

0%

0%

HMIe reports for Rothes, Bishopmill, Lhanbryde and Hopeman were published in Quarter 4 . None were evaluated as Very Good or Better against Improvements in Performance.

Percentage of primary schools receiving an evaluation of 'Satisfactory or better' - Learners' experiences

N/A

N/A

100%

100%

100%

100%

HMIe Reports for Rothes, Bishopmill, Lhanbryde and Hopeman Primary Schools were published in Quarter 4 . All were evaluated as Satisfactory or Better against Learners' Experiences.

Percentage of primary schools receiving an evaluation of 'Good or better' - Learners' experiences

N/A

N/A

0%

100%

100%

75%

HMIe reports for Rothes, Bishopmill, Lhanbryde and Hopeman Primary Schools were published in Quarter 4. Three were evaluated as Good or Better against Learners' Experiences.

Percentage of primary schools receiving an evaluation of 'Very Good or better' - Learners' experiences

N/A

N/A

0%

0%

0%

25%

HMIe reports for Rothes, Bishopmill, Lhanbryde and Hopeman Primary Schools were published in Quarter 4. One school was evaluated as Very Good against Learners' Experiences.

Percentage of primary schools receiving an evaluation of 'Satisfactory or better' - Meeting learning needs

N/A

N/A

100%

100%

100%

75%

HMIe Reports for Rothes, Bishopmill, Lhanbryde and Hopeman Primary Schools were published in Quarter 4. Three were rated as Satisfactory or Better against Meeting Learning Needs.

Percentage of primary schools receiving an evaluation of 'Good or better' - Meeting learning needs

N/A

N/A

0%

100%

100%

75%

HMIe Reports for Rothes, Bishopmill, Lhanbryde and Hopeman Primary Schools were published in Quarter 4. Three were evaluated as Good or Better against Meeting Learning Needs.

Percentage of primary schools receiving an evaluation of 'Very Good or better' - Meeting learning needs

N/A

N/A

0%

0%

0%

0%

HMIE Reports for Rothes, Bishopmill, Lhanbryde and Hopeman Primary Schools were published in Quarter 4. None evaluated as Very Good or Better against Meeting Learning Need.

Percentage of secondary schools receiving an evaluation of 'Satisfactory or better' - Improvements in Performance: English Language

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

100%

HMIe report on Buckie High School was published Quarter 4. Evaluation of Satisfactory or Better was given against Improvements in Performance

Percentage of secondary schools receiving an evaluation of 'Good or better' - Improvements in Performance: English Language

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

100%

HMIe published a report on Buckie High School Quarter 4. An evaluation of Good or Better given against Improvements in Performance

Percentage of secondary schools receiving an evaluation of 'Very Good or better' - Improvements in Performance: English Language

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

0%

HMIe published a report on Buckie High School in Quarter 4. Evaluation of Very Good or Better not given against Improvements in Performance

Percentage of secondary schools receiving an evaluation of 'Satisfactory or better' - Learners' experiences

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

100%

HMIe published a report on Buckie High School in Quarter 4. An evaluation of Satisfactory or Better was given against Learners' Experiences.

Percentage of secondary schools receiving an evaluation of 'Good or better' - Learners' experiences

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

100%

HMIe published a report on Buckie High School in Quarter 4. An evaluation of Good or Better was given against Learners' Experiences.

Percentage of secondary schools receiving an evaluation of 'Very Good or better' - Learners' experiences

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

0%

HMIe published a report on Buckie High School in Quarter 4. An evaluation of Very Good or Better was not given against Learners' Experiences.

Percentage of secondary schools receiving an evaluation of 'Satisfactory or better' - Meeting learning needs

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

100%

HMIe published a report against Buckie High School in Quarter 4. An evaluation of Satisfactory or Better was given against Meeting learning needs.

Percentage of secondary schools receiving an evaluation of 'Good or better' - Meeting learning needs

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

100%

HMIe published a report on Buckie High School in Quarter 4. An evaluation of Good or Better was given against Meeting learning needs.

Percentage of secondary schools receiving an evaluation of 'Very Good or better' - Learners' experiences

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

100%

HMIe published a report on Buckie High School in Quarter 4. An evaluation of Very Good or Better was given against Meeting learning needs.